Escape Into Books
Your home for book news, reviews, and bookish fun. Follow along on Facebook.
Escape Into Books
Your home for book news, reviews, and bookish fun. Follow along on Facebook.

John Lithgow on Dumbledore Role and Rowling Controversy
John Lithgow has confirmed he’s staying on as Albus Dumbledore in HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter series, even as some fans urge him to quit over J.K. Rowling’s views on trans rights. Speaking at the Rotterdam Film Festival, the 80-year-old actor called Rowling’s stance “ironic and inexplicable” but said he ultimately chose not to walk away from the role.
“It was a hard decision. It made me uncomfortable and unhappy that people insisted I walk away from the job. I chose not to do that,” Lithgow said, according to Variety. He added that while he’s never met Rowling, he “takes the subject extremely seriously” and sees no trace of transphobia in the original novels.
Lithgow revealed he has signed on to play Dumbledore for the full run of HBO’s ambitious, book-faithful remake — a commitment he joked doubles as a life plan. “I’m the oldest person in this entire room, just turned 80,” he said. “And yet I signed a contract – I will be playing Dumbledore for the next eight years! I absolutely have to keep at it… I felt: ‘Wow! That means I will live to be 88.’ I have that in writing.”
The new series is designed as a multi-season, page-close adaptation of Rowling’s seven novels, with each book getting its own season and long-time Potter producer David Heyman on board. HBO executives have repeatedly promised a “page-perfect” take, with Warwick Davis recently calling it a “very faithful” retelling with more room for character detail and cut subplots than the films allowed in a recent interview.
Behind the camera, the show is led by showrunner Francesca Gardiner and director Mark Mylod, both announced in 2024 as key figures steering this new chapter of the Wizarding World franchise. Casting has followed an openly inclusive process, with reports of more than 30,000 submissions across roles and an emphasis on reflecting a broader range of backgrounds in Hogwarts’ halls.
That effort at inclusivity sits uneasily alongside Rowling’s increasingly hardline public interventions on gender and trans issues. Years of backlash — including boycotts, counter-boycotts and fan campaigns — have reshaped how readers and viewers talk about the series, and even how they picture the author herself. One recent study found that left-leaning readers literally visualize Rowling’s face differently from others, reflecting deep political polarisation around her name.
Lithgow didn’t mince words about that tension. “She has created this amazing canon for young people… It’s about good versus evil, kindness versus cruelty. I find her views ironic and inexplicable,” he said, echoing comments he also summarized as “ironic and inexplicable” in a separate conversation reported by the Guardian. “In ‘Potter’ canon you see no trace of transphobic sensitivity. She’s written this mediation of kindness and acceptance. And Dumbledore is a beautiful role.”
Not everyone in Rotterdam agreed. One audience member reportedly left the room in protest, saying “things like these don’t help” and sparking a heated discussion that overshadowed the festival premiere of Lithgow’s new film Jimpa. Lithgow, for his part, seemed resigned to the clash. “I’m perfectly ready for collisions of opinion. I understand it,” he said.
Rowling herself has praised early scripts for the HBO show and previously said she worked “closely with the writers” as the project took shape in 2025 in an earlier statement. At the same time, she has doubled down on activism that has prompted fresh boycotts and calls for stars to distance themselves — from Martina Navratilova’s public support to new petitions around UK law.
All of this means HBO’s reboot, now eyeing an early 2027 premiere window for its first season, won’t just be judged on how faithfully it adapts the books. For many readers, Lithgow’s decision to stay as Dumbledore — and his attempt to separate a story about “kindness and acceptance” from its creator’s politics — is fast becoming a test case for whether they can still return to Hogwarts at all.