Escape Into Books
Your home for book news, reviews, and bookish fun. Follow along on Facebook.
New Hampshire’s latest attempt to tighten school book restrictions has stalled—for now. On Dec. 17, House Republicans failed to override Gov. Kelly Ayotte’s veto of a bill that would have made it easier for parents to remove books deemed “obscene” from public schools, falling short of the two-thirds majority needed.
The defeat came during the Legislature’s annual “veto day,” where GOP lawmakers also failed to revive vetoed bills on transgender bathroom access and mandatory fetal development videos in health classes. With Republicans holding just 55% of House seats, they needed substantial Democratic support and didn’t get it.
What the New Hampshire Bill Would Have Done
The vetoed measure, House Bill 324, would have required every school district to set up a formal process for parents to challenge and remove books labeled harmful to minors. Supporters pitched it as a parental rights safeguard; opponents warned it would turbocharge censorship and chill what students can read.
The New Hampshire push arrives amid a national wave of school book challenges. PEN America has tracked nearly 23,000 bans in U.S. schools since 2021, with 6,870 bans in the 2024–25 school year alone across 23 states according to its latest report. Many of those bans hit frequently challenged titles like Looking for Alaska, The Handmaid’s Tale, Beloved, and The Color Purple featured on PEN America’s most-banned list.
Book bans don’t fall evenly, either. In the 2023–24 school year, 36% of banned titles featured characters of color and 25% included LGBTQ+ characters, according to one analysis. Florida, Texas, and Tennessee alone are responsible for roughly 80% of all recorded bans this year, PEN’s broader censorship study found.
GOP Losses, But No Retreat on Culture War Bills
Ayotte, a Republican who has tried to stake out a more moderate lane, vetoed HB 324 and a separate “bathroom bill” allowing facilities to be separated by biological sex. House Republicans failed to override both, as well as a bill mandating fetal development videos in public school health classes.
Yet GOP leaders made it clear these ideas are coming back. Lawmakers have already filed new bills for 2026 that would create a statewide complaint process for school library materials and revive biological-sex bathroom mandates. Similar rollback efforts are unfolding elsewhere: in Iowa, a sweeping school book ban law is tied up on appeal even as thousands of titles hang in the balance, with one ruling poised to reshape shelves statewide.
And New Hampshire isn’t the only place where veto pens have slowed—but not stopped—the book wars. In North Dakota, Republican leaders likewise failed in 2025 to push through strict library restrictions after their own governor vetoed bills over vague, punitive language, the Associated Press reported.
For readers, authors, and librarians, New Hampshire’s failed override is a temporary reprieve rather than a turning point. With new bills already drafted and national bans still climbing, this veto day looks less like an ending and more like the next chapter in America’s long-running fight over who gets to decide what young people are allowed to read—and which stories are deemed too dangerous for the classroom.
